Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development?
Since we have entered a digital era, communication becomes significantly distinguished from that in the past. To be precise, using technical tools, instead of face-to-face conversation, tends to be a rather popular way in relationship establishing. Although the prosperity of technology may bring out concerns that social links might be weakened by these transformations, their merits could offset the drawbacks to some extent.
With the development of the media, a public stage for individuals to exchange further thoughts of the recent occurrences is built, accompanying opportunities for strangers with similar purposes to address better interaction. People also benefit from the technology since the barrier of distances when talking to remote family members is eliminated by the internet. The invention of social software also secretes personal information with anonymous rules, and in the case of that, communication can be relatively instinctive.
The recent days saw a dramatic increment of time people gazing at the screen rather than returning to reality, and the phenomenon, which reveals the drawback of the booming virtual world, should not be neglected. Colleagues may well be much less intimate than ever, especially when slight conflicts often evolve to be an official catastrophe through the broadcasting of social platforms. However, it is confident for the government and the community to enact laws and standards in order to regulate online behaviors and to foster a good cyber environment.
In conclusion, the advantages of development in interacting outweigh the disadvantages in the situation that the surfer never crosses the legal line.
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your o 56
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries over a twenty year period
- The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011 100
- whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck to what extent do you agree or disagree Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subj 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63346613546 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24911085097 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.657370517928 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.8281891063 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.4 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11460826359 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390565241403 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327132197148 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0629684602119 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294161669833 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.92 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.