Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become positive or negative development.
Since the dawn of advanced technology, communication between people has changed recently. Due to this, there are tremendous impacts on relationships become more wider, and extensive though doubtful about sincerity and integrity. However, such things often make pernicious impacts on society.
It is true that technological development make people around the globe close to one finger apart. It would make relations more closer and near even it was a childhood or year back relations in various countries. For instance, friends who detach after schooling would connected through innovative technology or applications like facebook, Instagram, whats up and so on. Similarly, overseas friends and relatives often contact each other through video calls and chats to maintain and strengthen the bonding with each other. Due to the onset of innovative technology communication would be more easier than past years such as minimise the duration of receiving and sending messages, convey information, this all would pass through mails and chats in fraction of seconds.
On the other hand, innovative technology may inclined people to wear a mask in relationships. Such as, responsibility and credibility towards the commitments become lessened after the arrival of this. For example, many people often tell lies to their partners or families regarding their actual behaviour or situations. Likewise, friends from social media sites might be a fraud or a criminal, they often cheat others for money or it would end up with physical or sexual abuse of many youngsters. Furthermore, after the arrival of technology, people could not have enough time to mingle with neighbours or close relatives who live nearby. They often contact through media instead of visiting their home or avoiding their physical presence to the core.
To sum up, technological growth has a major role in maintaining strong relationships and it shows various ways to interact. Nevertheless, addiction to the novel technology or trust in these innovations would make a detrimental effect on the community and personal life.
- People should focus more on solving problems related to the future and should not spend time thinking about the past To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature of their own country than other countries Do you agree or disagree 58
- The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of million years 87
- Some people think that hobbies should be linked with technology, while others believe that it is not necessary for hobbies to be involved with technology. Discuss, what is your opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your 78
- The government should invest more money in teaching science than in other subjects for a country’s development and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'wider' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: wider
...mendous impacts on relationships become more wider, and extensive though doubtful about s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...der, and extensive though doubtful about sincerity and integrity. However, such t...
^^
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'closer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: closer
...e finger apart. It would make relations more closer and near even it was a childhood or yea...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'connect'
Suggestion: connect
...riends who detach after schooling would connected through innovative technology or applic...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
... applications like facebook, Instagram, whats up and so on. Similarly, overseas frien...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 589, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...ative technology communication would be more easier than past years such as minimise the du...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, likewise, may, nevertheless, regarding, second, similarly, so, then, for example, for instance, such as, it is true, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47678018576 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9609438383 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606811145511 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1266622005 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5625 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6875 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284275830691 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857410245417 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550482910172 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15845948908 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211650862484 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.