Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make?
Has this been a positive or negative development?
It is no doubt that technology has made an unprecedented change in the way people communicate. There are many impacts technology has on human relationships; however, I believe this development will be a negative one for society.
Recent technological developments in communication have affected people’s relationships in diverse ways. Firstly, people no longer need to meet each other as they can interact with others from anywhere in a matter of clicks. This technological achievement proves extremely convenient in particular situations at work or school that require quickness and efficiency. Secondly, technology is an invaluable tool for making new friends. For example, people can make new contacts more easily by using social networks, such as Facebook and Twitter, to find others who share the same interests, and they interact through their smart devices rather than in person.
However, it seems to me that this development is negative for people's social lives. Firstly, most of these online relationships are short-lasting because personal communication is an important factor in every friendship. Online friends do not have shared experiences or help each other in their bad times; as a result, their friendship will not last long. Secondly, the availability of new communication technologies both isolates people and discourages real interaction. People tend to focus too much on social networking relationships, especially teenagers. As a consequence, this indiscriminate act will gradually destroy real-life friendships and make people isolated.
In conclusion, technology has certainly revolutionized communication between people. This essay discussed a few ways in which technology could benefit interaction; nevertheless, not all the outcomes of this development are positive.
- Some people think that hard working and determination are the key factors for being successful in the life other people feel that other factors are more important Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 78
- The pie charts give information about the percentage of world forest and timber in six different regions
- Some people are convinced that games online are a waste of time while others believe that games online can actually bring benefits about lots of benefits To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- What are the benefits of online learning Write an essay of about 250 words on this topic Make sure you support your position with relevant examples and evidence 84
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of taking attending extra classes 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, in particular, no doubt, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82575757576 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39727751153 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655303030303 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4797660811 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.533333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418254523385 0.244688304435 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131334890975 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06760983607 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248393896294 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483788918735 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.