Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships between people make?
Has this become a positive or negative development?
In recent years, using technology becomes more and more popular. It’s clear that thanks to technology, communicational activities between people have the amount of considerable changes. In my opinion, this development could have both positive and negative consequences in equal measure.
On in one hand, technology has great influences on many relationships in the economy, education, and social fields. Firstly, using telephone and telegrams makes an important contribution to exchanging information between business people in different countries without having any face to face meetings. Moreover, from an educational perspective, the internet gives useful supports for both students and their teachers. Thanks to zoom and some web pages, learning online at home or finding available documentaries is really easier and more effective. Last but not least, everyone uses some social networks like Facebook, Instagram to make new friends as well as share their interests and feelings.
On the other hand, these developments have some disadvantages. Interactions through telephone or emails can be limited due to lacking the correction. Sometimes, it’s difficult to transfer all attitudes or implement details of the speaker instead of meeting face to face. Therefore the problems can’t be solved effectively. Furthermore, social networks can cause isolation for everyone, especially the youth. They abuse Facebook and the internet so much that they don’t have any life skills as well as social relationships in the real world. Lastly, not all people can access technology easily. It is obvious that the old people find it difficult to approach new technology.
In conclusion, technological improvements have an indispensable impact on the types of relationships in communication. These developments have brought not only beneficial but also detrimental effects on our life.
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in Calgary 2000 2010 67
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- the pie chart compares water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 78
- In many countries traditional foods are being replaced by international fast food Many people think that it s good to eat traditional foods while others believe that fast food is a good choice Discuss both views and give a good choice 84
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city How can governments make urban life better for everyone 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...negative consequences in equal measure. On in one hand, technology has great inf...
^^^^
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...peaker instead of meeting face to face. Therefore the problems can’t be solved effectivel...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, lastly, moreover, really, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.770609319 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17519435224 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645161290323 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2653047719 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4444444444 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19617572466 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580372884584 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516679023313 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121295636348 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370565058535 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.89 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.