Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.

Essay topics:

Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.

These days the issue becoming serious that social interaction has getting transformed due to technology. Too many people try to avoid one to one interaction, In this essay we are going discuss why is that happening.

One of the increasing habit which people are practicing nowadays is excessive use of technologies for the interaction with their friends, family and those who even live side by side to their homes. Social apps used to be very successful specially by people who avoid to meet with their close ones physically. As communication going to be faster in current era and it has spur across the globe and that is all because of technologies. In fact, it has changed people's lifestyle and their habits that brings ease to them in their communication portfolio. Of course it has both positives and negatives but day by day its getting dominated all over the old concepts.

Lets move how it is advantageous to people, its becoming often that people try to save their time by using communication tools instead of meeting someone physically. For instance, if we notice that having some important discussion one to one will take too much, First yo need to make appointment, set time and then you go to them and have discussion whatever it is. So, in that regard you might be have time or not but you have to go and met them. Hereafter, By using social interactive applications or technology can make it easier by sitting at home and discuss each and every thing which is revolutionary. Even you can do live chats and show them yourself, accordingly.

In contrast, to look into its drawbacks, replacing technology is one of the horrific aspect in terms of non-interacting practices. People has learnt to forget about socialism even they don't know how to meet someone physically, what are the values, morality etc. Socializing yourself is one of the important habit you must have to be live in society, In other words people are getting worst at their behavior. Unfortunately interaction with each other is totally wiping out from society just due to this overcoming technology. By adding, if you met someone physically and spent time, you will get to know each other and obviously it will boost up your understanding, meanwhile, you both will be able to help each other in your toughest which is lacking nowadays.

Eventually, it makes me to conclude that communication gets faster and technology is replacing old concept of having face to face interaction which has both pros and cons.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-30 Ngochai 89 view
2020-01-29 pratik.dadhaniya 84 view
2020-01-29 pratik.dadhaniya 56 view
2020-01-06 toshaklg 78 view
2020-01-03 Harrynguyen1980 89 view
Essays by user Rohail Ali :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid meeting'.
Suggestion: avoid meeting
...very successful specially by people who avoid to meet with their close ones physically. As co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'spurred'.
Suggestion: spurred
... to be faster in current era and it has spur across the globe and that is all becaus...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...dominated all over the old concepts. Lets move how it is advantageous to people, ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...technology is one of the horrific aspect in terms of non-interacting practices. P...
^^
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...rnt to forget about socialism even they dont know how to meet someone physically, wh...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, if, look, so, then, while, for instance, in contrast, in fact, of course, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 24.0651302605 208% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2079.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 424.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90330188679 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87588792455 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516509433962 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 657.9 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5804974775 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27777777778 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217422016019 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651342365303 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580154811315 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111683031867 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641175077524 0.056905535591 113% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.