Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development?
In today’s world, there have been changes in the communication of humans due to the development of technology. This trend has significantly influenced people’s social relationships and business cooperation. Personally, I believe that this advancement brings humans various benefits.
Firstly, the era of technology has changed the way people interact with each other. This is because the continuous invention of social networking sites. For example, nowadays, many people are communicating on Facebook or Twitter. These well-known websites help to connect people around the world with each other. Without meeting directly in real life, humans can know about their friend’s apppearance and talk with them thanks to the help of the Internet. Additionally, entrepreneurs can communicate and make important deals on the Internet. Take an example in developed countries, members of many companies can have an online meeting instead of meeting directly in the office. Besides, companies can make use of media technology to sell and advertise their products. Obviously, the communication of people has changed considerably.
It can be seen that people probably have various benefits from this development. Firstly, individuals can widen and improve their relationships. For instance, as for those who cannot meet their relatives or friends regularly because of geological distance, they can keep in touch with each other with the help of social networking sites. Secondly, it is more convenient for companies to collaborate and communicate thanks to the Internet. Online meetings help individuals to save a large amount of time and money which is used for booking tickets for planes or trains to go to distant meeting places. Evidently, this change is a positive advancement for mankind.
In conclusion, technology has positively change the communication between humans due to its conveniences.
- Topic: Some people believe that smoking should be banned due to its effects, others argue that smoking has too many benefits to be banned. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The leaders of organisations are often older people. But some people say that young people can also be leaders. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The three pie charts show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing. What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 84
- Topic: Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 587, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Take an example in developed countries, members of many companies can have an on...
^^
Line 5, column 569, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'going', 'gonna'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: going; gonna
...or booking tickets for planes or trains to go to distant meeting places. Evidently, t...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 42, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'changed'.
Suggestion: changed
...n conclusion, technology has positively change the communication between humans due to...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69230769231 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18630284121 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562937062937 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.312847944 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6842105263 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0526315789 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52631578947 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282395983289 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948893498657 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951977323485 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163653950543 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07487011505 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.13 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.