Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a positive and negative development?
There is an undeniable fact that the developed technology have substantial influence on the human lifestyle altering. Actually, information technology has its own pros and cons that need further consideration in relationship among people. Both sides of this issue will be analyzed before drawing any conclusions.
First and foremost, it is obviously hard to imagine how our lives seems to be without the assist of technology which penetrates to everyone's habit. With the social media platform, communication never becomes this easy and convenient like nowadays before. People who live far away each others can make faster conversation online instead of writing letters as some previous decades. A conspicuous evidence is that with the dramatic climb of Facebook, Instagrams or Skype, foreign students can talk to their families and friends every day so that they will no longer suffer from homesick and have more motivation to study. It proves for the uppermost role of technology in enhancing people relationship through the distance hurdle.
On the other hand, there is a great amount of unforeseen consequences that this elite assistance could bring to our normal life, especially for teenagers, who spend most of their time sticking with electronic devices. In reality, more and more youngsters become less confident and are not willing to have a face-to-face conversation due to the lack of communication skills. Unfortunately, this expands the gap among individuals in society and a warning sign of social media abusing has been rose in recent years. Furthermore, virtual world consists of many tempting things that negatively impact on us such as criminal, debauchery and so on. A vast number of cases reported not only related to blackmailing, offending but also deceiving, therefore it raises people's awareness of utilizing technology.
In conclusion, negative and positive effects depend on how people harness its functions. Moreover, technology is our products so that we should take responsibilities for any issues, not to blame on the developments of it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Ngochai | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Harrynguyen1980 | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Garrett | 84 | view |
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician. Discuss both these view 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and ma 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44891640867 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04408527415 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674922600619 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1926797232 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.333333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232468484025 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662653211827 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041580434244 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124240292339 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318757742744 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.