In a number of countries, some people think it is neccessary to spend larfe sums of money on constructing new railway line for vert fast trains between cities. Other believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss boyh these views and give your opinion.
For many people around the world, the preferred method of transportation is high-speed rail. Communters travelling to and fron work rely on the safety and efficiency, whill tourists appreciate the convenience and novelty that trains provide. Others believe that highway, busses and regular trains should be improved before new, high-speed lines are added.
Safety is cheif among concerns for those who travel to work or school on a regular basis. If one drives a car, they have to concentrate not only to avoid accidents but also to prevent other drivers from causing a problem on the read. High-speed rail allows the communter to leave the driving to the professional controlling the train, allowing them to get some work done while getting to work safely.
In addition, people tend to move further and further away from city centers, where land and houses are more affordable. High-speed rail allows these communter to travel greater distances in a shorter ammont of time. There is a flow-on effect here, because if we can reduce the number of cars on the road, we can also cut down on traffic jams and road delays.
On the other hand, high-speed trains are expensive, and some believe this money could be spend on repairing motorways which are used by car busses and motorcycles. Another possibility would be to use this money to build more regular communter trains and busses to service the ever-expanding urban population. Moreover, boats and ferries could benefit from a budget which focuses more on existing forms of transport.
In the end, public transport is an issue which affects us all. The taxes which we pay should be spent on the type of transport which will have the most benefit to all citizen. In addition, we need to take into account how much the environment is damaged by fossil fuels and pollution. therefore, I believe in order to move foreward, we need to embrace the idea of high-speed rail so that future generations can be continue to live safely and efficiently.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-12 | Chiragzeel | 78 | view |
- Schools should do more to prepare students for the non-academic aspects of adulthood.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendationand explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing 70
- In a number of countries, some people think it is neccessary to spend larfe sums of money on constructing new railway line for vert fast trains between cities. Other believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss boyh the 78
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Government funding for pure science endeavors, such as space exploration, should be reduced in order todirect more funding towards humanitarian science projects.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim 83
- Five years ago, the local university built two new dormitories through different contractors: AlephConstruction and Gimmel Builders. The buildings were nearly identical, though it cost Gimmel Buildersapproximately 20 percent more to construct their dormit 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...epairing motorways which are used by car busses and motorcycles. Another possibil...
^^
Line 9, column 286, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
... damaged by fossil fuels and pollution. therefore, I believe in order to move foreward, w...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96130952381 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65501380131 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58630952381 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4600147735 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.1875 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8125 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190590108477 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606323708593 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611623963817 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102026784221 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064424177076 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.