In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
People from some parts of the world have different views about whether a great amount of funding should be taken for railway construction between cities or for present public transport improvement. While it really helps to meet people's wants if getting newer and faster trains, I believe that reaching people's needs with higher quality of public transportation seems to be quite more pressing and necessary.
On the one hand, an extended railway system brings a good convenience to people. When someone like travellers needs to choose a traffic tool to get to another city, trains which have routes that are corresponding to their plans can not only save the costs on travel compared to other means of transportation, but reduce the time wasted on the way. From a commuter's point of view, trains with higher speed between cities make it possible for job seekers to consider job opportunities outside the city they are living since the distance barrier can be moderately removed and no longer be such a serious problem. It can therefore be argued that the fulfillment of people's expectations to more convenient lives is a reflection of the stronger connection between cities.
On the other hand, I think what we cannot overlook is the needs of a society. It is a fact that people within a city are always faced with a series of problems in terms of public transportation in existence, such as the obsolescence of facilities, the sudden outage or delay during peak time, inadequate routes and high fares. For this reason, practical solutions taken to strengthen infrastructure development is seen as an urge on effectiveness, which improves people's living standard consequently. Since public transport is already a part of daily life, people basic benefits are linked to that and there are a bigger range of people being able to take advantages of improved service when governments do take steps.
In conclusion, I can understand the extension of the railway system involved with city connection allows some people attain unprecedented shortcuts in time and distance, but it seems to me that feasible measures focusing on satisfying people's needs of public transport are much more desirable in a city.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, look, really, so, then, therefore, while, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1847.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10220994475 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89468625418 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580110497238 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.8271774508 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.909090909 106.682146367 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.9090909091 20.7667163134 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4545454545 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225632838116 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852948589762 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502298454223 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141731944965 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503368348012 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.