In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both views.
It is extremely important to allocate money on constructing infrastructure to have a huge impact on community. However, some people argue that we should invest a huge amount of money on new railway system for fast trains to travel well from one city to another one whereas , some believe that subsidies are given to improve public transport system. In my opinion, I think that we should give more priority on railway system than public transport because the former can save more our precious time and it is economically friendly which is food for our planet.
If we improve rails and build new railways for modern fast trains, it can lessen our time which is very important for every passenger, especially nowadays (demanding of hours). As trains are punctual, adding with state-of-the-art technology for new system, they can make sure that travelers can get to their destinations safely without being time-consuming. In contrast, if we choose public transport, we will probably delay to our work during rush hours due to traffic jams which can have a negative impact on us. Therefore, it is better to advance rails which benefit commuters to travel from one place to another.
There is also a huge advantage by having excellent railway tracks which is none other than have a great effect on our nature. Increasing of vehicles can lead to detrimental consequences because those cars and buses have to be driven with the use of gases and petrol produce from burning fossils, non-renewable energy and they emit carbon dioxide which can increase global warming. On the other hands, high speed trains run on electricity instead of fossil fuel. Although they can contribute to carbon emissions, the climate impact of one train is less significant rather than that of many personal vehicles.
In conclusion, individuals should focus on and subsidize on developing and constructing new railway system in comparison with public transport to save valuable time as well as to be eco-friendly to our environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ell from one city to another one whereas , some believe that subsidies are given t...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...friendly which is food for our planet. If we improve rails and build new railwa...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s to travel from one place to another. There is also a huge advantage by having...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r than that of many personal vehicles. In conclusion, individuals should focus ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, as to, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09118541033 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83170590111 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.3642488522 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.583333333 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4166666667 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8333333333 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225208118391 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830975769405 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758064748056 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14651458477 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816595750833 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.