In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
By the technology advancement in electromagnetic, many high-speed inter-city trains are constructed. As the success stories from that invention, many people believe that allocating national budget for fast railway lines building is unequivocally essential. In stark contrast, some size groups of people prefer to use the money to upgrade existing public transportation. In this essay I will examine both views, though I think that enhancing public services are way more important.
To begin with, the development of high-speed interconnected trains makes life easier, particularly for those commuting a lot between cities. The train will cut time travel by almost a half and keep the body's energy always in good health condition. People benefited from technology as it has affordable prices. Prior to the fast trains, people must use several intermodal transportations to reach destination cities, and it costs higher in cumulative. Also, high-speed trains offer very comfortable services such as better air-conditioning, clean, and safe as it equips with securities in every locomotive. Due to such advantages, people often think that money should be employed in creating better railway lines for high-speed trains.
On the other hand, opponents argue that upgrading existing public transport should be encouraged before embarking on high-speed rail projects. Public transportation has an essential role in connecting cities and widely used by citizens today. However, many public modes of transport have considerable deficiency. Old buses and conventional trains use fossil fuel as the primary energy source as it could generate higher pollutants in the air, causing greenhouse effects. Following this, uncontrolled road transportations have made the congestion in urban cities worsen. Degradation of on-spot services such as dirty chairs and bad air circulation has made people unwilling to ride. Therefore, these issues should be tackled down first before going forward to create a high-cost fast train.
Overall, though many people urge to allocate money for high-speed rail establishment as it associated benefits, improving the existing public transport is the priority as it will overcome fundamental problems in societies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- The graph shows the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010 78
- The chart below shows what anthropology graduate from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting th 73
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 56
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 56
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'allocating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'urge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: allocating
...in. Overall, though many people urge to allocate money for high-speed rail establishment...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, therefore, i think, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1911.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75602409639 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13252287997 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623493975904 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0358617676 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.166666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30207298323 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864686749832 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565369622007 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185718975656 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292650489311 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.