In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. others believe the money should be spent on improving the existing public transport.

In term about the growth of the population, the demand for public transportation increase significantly. The government should think about what is the best kind of transportation which is appropriate for their country. Furthermore, both parties have their reason among people to the argument whether the government shall spend the money to construct for the railway or other types of transport.

To begin with, the country which has density population need the type of transport that capable to move the number of people and goods. The train might be the best to solve about the problem. By using this transport, the country will get some benefit such as reducing pollution, accident, and the use of the private car. For instance, Singapura has applied this transport to solve the traffic jam because the subway has been built in which it can be operated in underground. Others example, China, the biggest country that develops in the industrial sector, is utilized train to deliver goods in their region.

On the other hand, the train has several limitations where it is obtained with the operation. Firstly, the island region can’t be achieved by this model of transportation but the ship might be the most suitable. Secondly, train transportation just provides to stop in the particular station so that it will not be efficient to deliver goods when the warehouse is not covered by the station.

In conclusion, the model transportation which capable to full-fill the demand of public shall consider where it will be operated. The train suitable for the region with land dominancy but it might not cover for the island region.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11524163569 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81388329918 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527881040892 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2123134235 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.846153846 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23993620059 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838474587324 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042672629916 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144769697483 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522099930207 0.056905535591 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.