Public transportation has been becoming increasingly more popular mean of transportations in almost all major cities. Since the construction of railways might be useful for cities, there is a contrasting view among people. While some people claim that money should invest in improving existing public transport systems, others state that new railway lines for high-speed trains should be considered. In this essay, I intend to put this matter into comparative perspective and provide evidence as to why new railway lines is superior.
On one hand, there are likely to be some people who claim that money should spend improving existing transport in cities. It might be believed that investing money to construct new railway systems is a waste of money. This far-fetched view assumes that less money is required for improving facilities. Governments are able to reconstruct or redesigned some old-fashioned trains and railways, while they are no longer have to allocate a huge amount of money. Another reason that why these group of people sticks to their belief is that construction of new railway lines might take a lot of time and require natural resources. As new railways need a lot of space, natural habitat should be destroyed. On the other hand, new high-speed trains are needed a large amount of money and resources to be manufactured.
There are, however, some people who state that new railways and fast trains are needed for every city, especially cosmopolitan cities in which people are more likely to suffer from traffic congestion. Although, it is not going to be easy for the governments to build new public transport systems in all cities in a country, in my opinion, it brings multitude of benefits for people. Firstly, by constructing new railway, people have wide access to any part of a city without suffering from traffic. Secondly, adding some fast trains into public transportation system would be beneficial for people who use train for commuting to their home or work. Fast trains can expeditiously carry people to any part of a city in a few time.
In conclusion, although, in some cases, some facilities should be repaired, constructing new railways as well as adding fast trains not only help people to travel to wherever they want, but also reduce traveling time.
- In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.Discuss both these views and give your own o 78
- Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information aboutthe defendant’s criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime.Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed an 73
- Young people say that traveling to different countries benefits them and the society. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 73
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transportDisucss both the 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 720, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'few times'.
Suggestion: few times
...carry people to any part of a city in a few time. In conclusion, although, in some cas...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10610079576 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82838981121 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498673740053 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0920066547 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.235294118 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1764705882 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94117647059 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.453417291931 0.244688304435 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160530246469 0.084324248473 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897113003413 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285750635567 0.151304729494 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820707067492 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.