in a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Other believe the mony should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discus both these views and give your own opinion.
Today trains consider common of means of transportation around the world so countries try to boost the necessary infrastructure such as railways and fast trains. Some people believe it is very significant to spend a fund to establish new railways or develop existing ones. Others believe it is better to spend money to make important development for public transport such as cars or buses. I totally agree that it is better for any country to spend its budgets on railway and import speedy trains.
To begin with first argument, some people have thought it is very important spending money on railways project because this mean of transport consider the more safer and fast transport if compared with other transports. Moreover, using trains insides cities or towns reduce traffic jam because these trains have special routs. For example, most of developed countries such as Britain and Germany have ample networks of railways systems. In addition, in long run, the railways save a money for a state because the infrastructure of railways is established a once. As result, if a country tries to get a safe transport, it will need advanced trains.
On the other hand, other people prefer using a public transportation such as cars or buses because they think normal transports (cars, or buses) have flexibility in movement, however trains do not have this advantage. Additionally, routes can change easily for cars and buses and do not cost a lot of funds, but changing routes if necessary need effort and remarkable funds.
To sum up, many people believe that, money for their country should spend to develop railway networks. While, others think the government should spend precious fund on other transports like cars and buses. I do believe that it is a necessary to spent money on development railway and buy new trains.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- in a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Other believe the mony should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discus both thes 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 67
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where releva 56
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how there causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 156, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'safer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: safer
...use this mean of transport consider the more safer and fast transport if compared with oth...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 481, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'money'.
Suggestion: money
...ddition, in long run, the railways save a money for a state because the infrastructure ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, such as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0297029703 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69395895485 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508250825083 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3926568466 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.857142857 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342666414647 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131413848604 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732859638615 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22955423827 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0815660282395 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.