In a number of countries, some people thinks it’s necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
In today's modern world, it is widely believed that governments should invest greatly on the construction of railway lines for super trains. Meanwhile, other people argue that the development in public transportation is more worthy. From my point of view, although the improvement of the public means of transportation is, to some extent, beneficial, I am of the opinion that the existence of fast trains with new railway lines deserves the large sums of money.
On the one hand, there are certain advantages to focusing on improving public transportation. It is obvious that when the buses or sharing cars are better equipped, it will encourage citizens to utilize them, thus saving the environment. As people may feel unsafe being on a bus due to pickpocketing and the like, they will not take the bus to work. However, if the governments distribute money for the cameras surveillance on public transportation as well as the facilities and engines, they can assure the people and attract more users. As a result, the use of private cars or personal vehicles can decrease, followed by less carbon dioxide emissions and other exhaust fumes. People then can reside in a better atmosphere with fresh air and less noises from motorbikes, cars and the like.
On the other, there are a myriad of contributors to why I advocate that governments should allocate financial investment to the railway system with supertrains. The first thing to notice is that the use of bullet trains or high speed trains can nourish the trading power. Only when there are these means of transportation with colossal space can businesses transport their bulky products constructively such as cars. In other words, the trains connecting the cities can be a precursor to better promotion of goods. Furthermore, it is not only the industry that can benefit from trains but they can also contribute to the economic growth in terms of tourism. The convenience of fast travelling will bring the incentives to tourists to travel more, thus giving more money through tickets and other services to the national budget. According to the University of People, there is a higher percentage of satisfaction as well as a 60% increase in the profits of several countries after constructing railways and trains. Without doubt, there are greater advantages of this investment
In conclusion, although the public transportation is, to some extent, worth investing in, I believe people can take great advantages from the train system including better trading, higher rates of travelling and enormous revenues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 84
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems 73
- The charts below show the differences in how people in 3 countries learned English in 2010 and 2015 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cameras'' or 'camera's'?
Suggestion: cameras'; camera's
...he governments distribute money for the cameras surveillance on public transportation a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 744, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun noises is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... a better atmosphere with fresh air and less noises from motorbikes, cars and the li...
^^^^
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...the like. On the other, there are a myriad of contributors to why I advocate that ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'these means'?
Suggestion: this means; these means
... the trading power. Only when there are these means of transportation with colossal space c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1078, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re greater advantages of this investment In conclusion, although the public trans...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2162.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 417.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18465227818 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93357815015 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529976019185 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 658.8 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6662164657 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.176470588 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5294117647 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.29411764706 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286738211952 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850965423512 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701519890956 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188493377799 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111671823045 0.056905535591 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.