One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing.
Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
In modern days, the population of the world live longer and level of life has increased. That is why governments have a dilemma "should they improved their medical system or not?". I think, if governments develop medicine it will bring many benefit than harm.
First of all, health care improvement will lead to better people well-being. It is mean that citizens will have less diseases and illnesses. Also, it will fix problem with work, because people will take less time for treatment and more for job. In a result that improvement will influence on work productivity, For example, in Japan, car industry increased income on 10 per cent only because they improved the hospitals where their employers go to get treatment.
However, there is one problem from economical standpoint. Companies and governments should invest large amount of money to develop health care system. Nevertheless, it is not a big problem because investment will returned in future. For example, monetarily part will come back with taxes from medical insurance or by incomes from treatments.
Another positive point is benefits for medical science. Doctors and scientists will have possibility make researches in problem areas like cancer. That development can help invent same drugs against AIDS, for example.
In conclusion, as it is shown, improvement in a medical system sooner or later will give a lot of benefits. I shure that governments should decide to fund medicine for the healthiest future.
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement,To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 46
- Some people think it is acceptable to use animals for the benefit of humans. Other people think it is wrong to exploit animals for human purposes. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. ( discursive essay) 84
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the results of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.Summ 61
- The first chat below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compar 78
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language.Discuss both these views and give your own o 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun benefit seems to be countable; consider using: 'many benefits'.
Suggestion: many benefits
...ernments develop medicine it will bring many benefit than harm. First of all, health care ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 113, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun diseases is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ing. It is mean that citizens will have less diseases and illnesses. Also, it will f...
^^^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'return'
Suggestion: return
...t a big problem because investment will returned in future. For example, monetarily part...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...roblem because investment will returned in future. For example, monetarily part will come...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...same drugs against AIDS, for example. In conclusion, as it is shown, improveme...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 238.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26890756303 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82457963661 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634453781513 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1585052235 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.375 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.875 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140027512702 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488127675757 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394819089832 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0804159537671 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411651711122 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.