Online classes make conventional classrooms unnescessary To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Online classes make conventional classrooms unnescessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Cyber learning is a new model of schooling, which has gained a lot of traction. Thanks to the convenience it brings, many people assert that traditional classes are no longer needed. From my personal viewpoint, I strongly disagree with the mentioned statement.
The most notable dissimilarity between ordinary schools and the online alternative is physical interaction. Being connected through flat screens of laptops or smartphones, perceiving lessons are likely to be refrained as students could not observe properly. Face-to-face education brings about association among pupils. Consequently, classmates or schoolmates can easily discuss and support each other with assignments, which means, resulted in higher academic performances. Moreover, social skills, considered as an essential substance, are inclined to be developed better in the conventional schooling environment.
The second reason for my opposition related to practicality and concentration. Firstly, subjects like Biology, Chemistry, and Physics require experiments and research, those demand equipment of laboratories and necessary implements. For instance, graduates who desire to attain the Phd degree of Chemistry have to conducted numerous research during the course. Cyber classes are seemed not capable of responded that demand. Examine this elementary, online learning pales in comparison with ordinary form of classes. Secondly, the focus ability of leaners can hardly be guaranteed while having smart devices surrounded. Social media and other notification appearance on your device would distract you from the presentation of the lecturers. In this case, expectedly, results would be unpotential.
Benefits brought about by studying online can not be denied. However, the necessities of traditional schools are still valuable.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-26 Trần Ánh Vy 78 view
2024-10-21 aceg1000 73 view
2024-10-19 vidung 90 view
2024-10-19 Tuan Harry 11 view
2024-10-19 Tuan Harry 11 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, while, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.03891050584 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13629297597 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.727626459144 0.561755894193 130% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4950245061 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2222222222 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2777777778 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61111111111 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0775562409116 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0218082398423 0.084324248473 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0248140480303 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0449921721674 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00824150349615 0.056905535591 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.89 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.16 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.46 8.58950901804 133% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.