Only reason to work hard is to earn money. To what extent you do agree or disagree
Only cause to work more to make more money. I balance with this argument and this essay will examine both sides of the argument before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some argument in favor of people work hard is to earn money. First, government subsidies for job people are believed to equalize work opportunities among economic society regardless of their families background. This financial support, presumably tends not only to increase employees the overall workplace enrollment rate of more progress in work at the company but also people work hard is to earn money are worthy with their trying because when people work hard often on the night shift, it make their bad health. So, people work hard are worthy with more money than other employees, this is easy understand because society are very modern, people economic demands more by more. Second, work hard probably result in a greater supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that skilled and knowledgeable human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technological development in any nations.
Nevertheless, people work hard are not only reason to earn money because will have many reasonable for that argument. First, human work more is synonymous with they have talents for this job or position in a company. In a company will have many positions for each person, meaning that there would be people with low status will not be respected and there’s a lot of competition for one position such as you want to become a boss in company you just need work hard than other people to reach that position. So, it like people goal in a work place. Second, in a workplace would tempt many talented people including those who are good at presentation or show interest in job pursuits, thereby great burdens for new employees and bad personnel because in a company will have many new employees easy to be fired from the company so people have a tendency to work hard to keep the company, not simply for the money. It, instead, would be a more financial viable option if the resources were focused on supporting in a suitable company not a company that exploits labor.
I was discussed this argument and I will give conclusion is drawn. In my perspective, they can be for money or they can be goal so I balanced.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-25 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-24 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 84
- Nowadays in many countries household waste e g food packaging is increasing day by day What are the causes for that How can this problem be solved 73
- The table chart show the population of New Zealand between 2011 and 2012 67
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent Universities should acquiesce formal rival numbers of manlike and womanly students in all subjects To what extent I agree 56
- In some country it is illegal for companies to reject job applicants Is this positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 515, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
... work hard often on the night shift, it make their bad health. So, people work hard ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 405.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84444444444 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59973619006 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479012345679 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.5996511661 49.4020404114 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.625 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3125 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215938952442 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919401272822 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927602861179 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127851491674 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634572512716 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.