The only way to improve the safety on our own road is to have
stricter punishment for driving offenders. To what extent do you
agree or disagree?
In recent years, how to improve the safety on our own road has been a hot topic for society. Some people argue that the only way is to have stricter penalties for driving offenders. Although I agree on this idea, I believe that some methods would reduce the number of traffic accidents on road.
On the one hand, having stricter punishment and increasing the penalties for irresponsible drivers would improve road safety, For example, it is the fact that using a mobile phone while driving motorbike is repeat this offence. So having strict penalties such as small fines, licence suspension, driver awareness course, and even prison can act as a deterrent
On the other hand, having some ways could limit a lot of traffic accidents. first of all, it is vitally important to educate people about rules before they start to drive. For example, in schools teach could teach road symbol signs through games to the student can remember easily. Secondly, the government could provide the best conditions for driver by improving and expanding better road to move safely, finally, local councils could reduce road accidents by investing in better public transport which would to me that fewer people would need to travel by car
In conclusion, having stricter punishment for driving offenders is a good way but I suppose that some methods are better to improve the safety on our own road
- The charts below show the percentage water used for different purposed in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Many people say that we have developed into a throw away culture because we are filling up our environment with so many plastic bags and rubbish that we cannot fully dispose of To what extent do you agree with this opinion and what measures can you recomm 75
- The only way to improve the safety on our own road is to have stricter punishment for driving offenders To what extent do you agree or disagree 54
- Many people say that we have developed into a “throw-away”culture, because we are filling up our environment with so manyplastic bags and rubbish that we cannot fully dispose of. To whatextent do you agree with this opinion and what measures can your 77
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is toincrease the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagreewith this statement? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., and even prison can act as a deterrent On the other hand, having some ways coul...
^^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...could limit a lot of traffic accidents. first of all, it is vitally important to educ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns for driver by improving and expanding better road to move safely, finally, loc...
^^
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fewer people would need to travel by car In conclusion, having stricter punishmen...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, second, secondly, so, while, for example, i suppose, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 1615.20841683 71% => OK
No of words: 233.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9356223176 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4574554132 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579399141631 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 114.153131801 49.4020404114 231% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 143.75 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.125 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.125 7.06120827912 228% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292366454664 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130343139822 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946458283939 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217984741822 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105992771501 0.056905535591 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.