Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment?
Over the recent decades, the undeniable truth has been presented that the increasing rate of organized travelling to rural regions has been the hot topic among people. There are some empirical evidences showing it beneficial for locals, but the damages to the environment it brings are justifiable too.
On the one hand, tourism is becoming a craze nowadays and remote areas are especially targeted, meanwhile contributing as leading factor in environmental issues. In fact, numerous negative human activities have proved ominous for ecosystems and habitats, indicating environmental destruction in the name of development. For example, providing and flourishing transport and infrastructure facilities like road and highways massive numbers of trees are cut down, further resulting in havoc like soil erosion, landslides, floods, global warming, that is a heavy toll on bio diversity. Secondly, no doubt despite of economical benefits to the government through tour and travel industry there is a big pressure of mounting environmental pollution. To explain, such sites are vulnerable to degradation by large amount of the toxic waste irresponsibly disposed by the tourists and visitors.
On the other hand, the various merits support such explorations. Firstly, developments made life convenient at faraway places, which mean that people are enjoying the luxuries of modern life in arid lands even. A clear illustration of this is the comfortable commuting between their home and workplace owing to modernized infrastructure and facilities, regarding roads and railways. In addition, developments also bring employment, education, medical facilities and many more that improves the lifestyle of people these areas. Such development is not only beneficial to the local population but to the nation in terms of economy and finding more hidden talent from such places which used to face lack of exposure earlier.
In conclusion, despite exploring unknown destination threatens its natural environment, the benefits overwhelm the disadvantages and that government should heavily invest its resources and finance in the improvement of far-off lands in sustainable way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-25 | vishal sachdeva | 89 | view |
- Nowadays people always throw the old things away when they buy new things some people claim that the broken things should be repaired and used again What factors cause this phenomenon What effects the phenomenon leads to 56
- Many people spend a lot of money on clothes haircuts and beauty products to enhance their appearance Some people think that it is a good way to spend money while others think that there is a better way to spend it Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Animals should not be used for the benefit of human beings unless there is evidence that the animals do not suffer in any way To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 81
- Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some students take one year off between finishing school and going to university in order to travel or to work Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 613, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...iversity. Secondly, no doubt despite of economical benefits to the government through tour...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7399380805 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12201126621 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668730650155 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3823528883 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.615384615 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8461538462 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3846153846 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164142273052 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424320001948 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321312846248 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0717045682906 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419474073141 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.13 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.