owning a gun
In the modern society, some people say that individuals should have a right to own a gun in their home. Personally, I totally disagree with having a private gun. And this essay will discuss the main reasons why I choose this idea.
To begin with, relating to the personal perspective, it is dangerous for people when they are permitted to own a kind of weapon such as a gun in their house. The reason is that individuals have a tendency to live privately nowadays in modern society, so they are easier to be extremely stressful when facing to a great deal of pressure from a heavy workload or broken relationships. Specifically, living alone without sharing ups and downs in life with others, people are likely to commit suicide. At that time, with a gun in home, it is really easy for them to kill themselves.
On the other hand, regard to the social perspective, owning a gun poses a severe threat on the safety of society. When the governments allow having weapons that are not used with right purposes, the life of citizens might be threatened seriously. This can be explained by the fact that it is more convenient for criminals to own guns, and they are likely to cause robberies or even become terrible murderers. As a result, the crime rate can significantly increase, and society is much more unstable, which makes residents live in fears while the authorities also struggle to solve this problem.
In conclusion, although there is an idea that citizens are permitted to have a gun, in my opinion, I beg to differ due to its severe negative impacts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-30 | IVANTRUONG | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | IVANTRUONG | 67 | view |
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree 59
- Education for young people is important in many countries. However, the others think government should spend more money for education in adult population who can not read and write.To what extent do you agree or disagree? - 3 78
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 11
- Owning a gun 73
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their time. Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, really, so, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1296.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7299270073 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71770165502 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591240875912 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3292251738 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278083713012 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110323300488 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1123736934 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175248414883 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566415078165 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.