Numerous parents always give all things, which their offsprings ask. From my perspective, I perceive that it is a deleterious nurturing methods. Thereby, it can lead to many adverse outcomes when they were mature people.
For once, the first major reason for this problem is due to wanting to meet their children’s demands. It can be explained by the fact that they over-indulge their youngsters. They always do the best things for them. An illustration of that it it is whenever children get caught up in a hassle, their parents always appear to assist them. This makes them more and more reliant on other people. Moreover, when they have a difficult problem, they won’t look for solutions, they only have other people address its for them. Secondly, if the parents did that too much, their children after leaving their families wouldn’t live alone. Because when they are in home, all wishes are implemented immediately, even this is the most unfavour ones.
Consequently, when these wayward children have grown up, the outcomes will appear clearly. Aftering leaving school, they can’t live in dormitory with other people, because of in there, they don’t feel homelike. They must do themselves everything. There is also a ostacle when they go to work. When they have problematic issue, they can’t tackle them quickly. Take my cousin as an example, at home, he is always pampered by his parents. So, when he has any problems, mu uncle always deal it for him. But when he go to work, he has to solve all issues.
In conclusion, parents’ indulging is bad for their offsprings. This may make their children more and more dependent on other people as well as they can’t address themselves problems.
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In some countries owing a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think it is a positive or negative situation 61
- Some people say that e books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magzines to what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The diagram shows the process of making recycled paper from old newspaper Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparison where relevant 78
- Some people say that e books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magzines to what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 240, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: it
...hings for them. An illustration of that it it is whenever children get caught up in a...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ngs for them. An illustration of that it it is whenever children get caught up in...
^^
Line 2, column 507, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ns, they only have other people address its for them. Secondly, if the parents did ...
^^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...do themselves everything. There is also a ostacle when they go to work. When they...
^
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'goes'.
Suggestion: goes
...cle always deal it for him. But when he go to work, he has to solve all issues. I...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, as to, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 24.0651302605 224% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98606271777 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60749193522 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 5.43587174349 294% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6547198646 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.1428571429 106.682146367 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6666666667 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375597374315 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117746987998 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07601781543 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227150242788 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793758562795 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.0946893788 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 50.2224549098 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.07 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.