In the age of modernisation, museums still considered most valuable and enduring as these stores a tremendous collection of knowledge. It is stated that in previous time, essential knowledge of traditions and historical events was kept in museums. In these days, social media has been offering opportunity to people to get knowledge in same way as in museum so museum can experience the least preference. I partially agree with the statement and my partial agreement will be articulated in following paragraphs before writing a conclusion.
To begin with, internet has made it easy for people to enhance their knowledge regarding history and culture. The most prevailing reason behind choosing internet for getting understanding by people is that minimum consumption of time with free of cost. To put it in another way, it is not necessitate to go outside for people to see and observe things related to culture and history and in home they have chance to see all these on social media. For example, in America, majority of people giving priority to internet over museum if they have to accomplish any knowledge and people feel accuracy in it. Hence, it is clear that why internet has been gaining attention of people.
Paradoxically, today, museums are eminent in the same way as they were in the past in several nationalities due to certain reasons. The predominant factor behind this is that reality and information often can be seen and museums. However, on internet several shots of discriminations and artificialness observed in the precious information of cultural things. For instance, in India, people considering museums a unique way to learn about past events and culture owing to having respect about museums in their minds. Therefore, it can be said that museums is going to be remained in the similar position because they have supporters as well.
In conclusion, after analysing partial agreement about the importance of museums I personally feel that internet is extremely superficial approach to attain knowledge of historical things for people. Nonetheless, extinction of museums will not be expected due to the prioritisation these still have.
- the bar chart shows the percentage of elderly citizens in three countries in 1980 2000 2030 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places At the same time there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages Give reasons for your answe 78
- Small businesses are disappearing and being replaced by large multinational companies Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Some people think that music plays an important role in society Others thinks it is simply a form of entertainment 84
- More and more wild animals are on the verge of extinction and others are on the endangered list What are the reasons for this What can be done to solve this problem 84
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'necessitated'.
Suggestion: necessitated
...st. To put it in another way, it is not necessitate to go outside for people to see and obs...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... been gaining attention of people. Paradoxically, today, museums are eminen...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, nonetheless, regarding, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25287356322 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9918968382 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534482758621 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1539266653 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254871604354 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826275041042 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410386922006 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157725887536 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0119897183308 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'necessitated'.
Suggestion: necessitated
...st. To put it in another way, it is not necessitate to go outside for people to see and obs...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... been gaining attention of people. Paradoxically, today, museums are eminen...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, nonetheless, regarding, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25287356322 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9918968382 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534482758621 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1539266653 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254871604354 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826275041042 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410386922006 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157725887536 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0119897183308 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.