In the past, most people lived in small villages where everyone knew everyone else. Nowadays, most people live in large cities where they only know a few people in their area. What do you think were advantages and disadvantages of living in a small cities
Citizens in the old days considered residing in small villages instead of living in large cities. Meanwhile, citizens in recent decades tend to prefer living in the cities where it has massive numbers of residents, the development industry and social equipment. However, I believe they both have benefits and drawbacks of residing in a small village.
On the one hand, I personally suppose that there are three main rationales demonstrating the people’s purpose of claiming to live in the countryside. The most considered reason is living in a small village helps people secure a connection to each other which is a primary reason to protect resident neighborhoods when some adverse issues can occur. Secondly, residing in a small village is an opportunity for residents to look after their house as well as their family’s wealth. In addition, there is less pollution in villages which is a substantial cause to enhance their health. This is because, if humans are affected by polluted air, they might be prone to lung cancer.
On the other hand, I consider there are a few reasons for the drawbacks. The most obvious cause is that small villages can not have a high standard of living which means the citizens in that area are unlikely to reach for an acceptable quality of medical services or education. For instance, according to a recent survey, there are 60% of people who predominantly live in villages could not have a satisfactory curriculum in their local school. In addition, some people think that living in country-side is a dead-end to developing their careers. The adolescents who want to start up their own companies tend to establish in some vibrant places that have a massive number of citizens.
In conclusion, the benefits and drawbacks of living in a small village are illustrated above. In my perspective, living in a small village or in a large city depends on people’s opinions and assessments. A small village positively creates a strong connection between people but it is definitely impractical for someone who has the desire to pursue their business.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-30 | binhnek | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-01 | phuongnguyen1234 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-22 | hlam91 | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-07 | Dung Hanh | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | golemzzz2006 | 61 | view |
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The table and bar chart below give information about travelling to work in Houston Texas 67
- In many parts of the world children and teenagers are spending more and more of their time indoors What do you think are the causes of this problem hat measures could best be taken to solve it 61
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 492, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l as their family’s wealth. In addition, there is less pollution in villages whic...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07246376812 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91057505915 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515942028986 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3428440126 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.375 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5625 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366141770588 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122765157163 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770685954527 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23639976849 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460295649292 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 492, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l as their family’s wealth. In addition, there is less pollution in villages whic...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07246376812 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91057505915 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515942028986 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3428440126 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.375 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5625 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366141770588 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122765157163 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770685954527 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23639976849 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460295649292 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.