In the past, most people lived in small villages, where everyone knew everyone else. Nowadays, most people live in large cities where they only know a few people in their area. What do you think were the advantages and the disadvantages of living in small community?
After the modernization, more and more people have moved to cities with an unknown environment. Back in time, people preferred to live in their own communities. Living among their own communities had their pros and cons.
To start with, people living in a community knew each other well and had good relationships among themselves. This is what is missing from the living communities today. Having a healthy relationship with the people you live around is a sound practice. For instance, during the times of emergency namely house fire, robbery and medical emergencies, etc. one could approach the neighbors seeking help for their cause. This dependence on each other in the time of need was one major advantage that the people living in the villages enjoyed.
On the other hand, some people find the involvement of other people in their family or individual business nosy which could’ve been a problem if you live around the people you know well. They would like to know the mundane details of your life such as what time you are coming home, where you are going and what is your plan for the day etc. Personal space would’ve been the downside of living in a community. Another disadvantage of living in a community could’ve been a parochial environment. The exposure that a person might get in a community is limited. Usually, you’ll find like-minded people and this could retard your growth. People nowadays prefer living in a heterogeneous environment to keep them updated and blended in the world. The homogenous surrounding could’ve been a great downhill to the communal housings.
Concluding, there are two sides to everything. As the world moved forward, the living situations changed with it. Back in the day, today’s culture would’ve been a bad thing. But with evolution, this culture has been accepted globally. Hence, with time everything changes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-15 | Dikshaa_007 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-03 | Venkata Saikiran | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | ducnguyenhcm | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-21 | kiran123 | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-29 | Farzaneh.A | 61 | view |
- Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the world cup and that the money would be better spent on other things. However, others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear, positive impact on a 56
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens 50
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.You should write at least 250 words 61
- Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution; others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, well, for instance, such as, you know, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21103896104 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91754337915 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551948051948 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.993505891 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.9545454545 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13636363636 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288297889996 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853665653947 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730157950652 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17475794596 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833800442509 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.