In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend

Essay topics:

In the past, shopping was a routine domestic task. Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby.
To what extent do you think this is a positive trend?

It is often argued that shopping is now a hobby for everyone whereas in the past, it was only a routine task. I partially agree with this statement and think that shopping frequently has brought positive change as well as resulted loss of excessive money in a family.

On the first hand, family relationship is now improving and thanks to shopping for this positive change. Since many youngsters like to shop new clothes and buy their favourite toys or gadgets, parents nowadays often fulfill their desires through shopping. This eventually results happiness in both sides and thus helps to grow relationship between parents and their children. For example, my best friend always appreciates and respects his guardians because they often buy him new gadgets when asked. Hence, shopping more often has bought positive change in a family.

However, shopping as a passion has caused people to waste a great amount of money. In other words, children nowadays are too much addicted in buying unnecessary products even though they own all the required things. This reflects that their desire to shop unnecessary products is unavoidable and consequently people end up spending money for the things which are needless. A teenager who already owns a smartphone, for example, buys another one when a new mobile phone emerges in the market. This is simply a waste of money. Situations like this are growing because of taking shopping as a hobby.

In conclusion, although I believe shopping has brought improvements and positive impacts, I would also like to suggest that this behaviour leads to loose vast amount of money for the things that we do don’t usually require.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-11 dorae 61 view
2023-11-11 dorae 61 view
2023-01-08 Elena2509 73 view
2023-01-08 Elena2509 61 view
2023-01-07 Elena2509 61 view
Essays by user Sagar Gurung :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...to suggest that this behaviour leads to loose vast amount of money for the things tha...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, hence, however, so, thus, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11678832117 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63110084802 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598540145985 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4472489904 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.142857143 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22201985083 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790574905279 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506568556369 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138304257478 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487523568204 0.056905535591 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.