It is true that people these days are trying to accomplish the so-called work-life balance despite of hectic schedules and extensive to-do lists. Some have managed to achieve such goal whilst many have failed miserably. Even though this problem facing people of all ages can be perennial, there are some ingenious solutions to tackle it.
The excessive workload can account for the imbalance between people’s work and life. Heavy workload means workers have to strenuously exert themselves and fully commit to the jobs. Furthermore, the fierce competition from colleagues, i.e. peer pressures, makes people compete and struggle relentlessly or else they will be eradicated out of the industry. Discouragingly, many individuals tend to associate wealth and material possessions with high social status and social recognitions. For instance, the images of billionaires such as Bill Gates or Jeff Bezos spark off the perception that being rich will bring people happiness and admiration. Thus, they drown themselves in making money and achieve such qualities without even thinking of spending time for their families or at least their personal life, and health.
Various solutions can be adopted to address this problem. Corporates, companies or businesses should reduce the amount time working at the office and offer labors more annual leaves and perks. This could not only alleviate stress but also help create more friendly work environment hence improve the workers’ performance. Fundamentally, the employees themselves must be aware that being rich, obtaining high social status, or being widely recognized by communities are not the sole purposes they should embrace. Rather, it is establishing the chemistry and understanding among family members and being able to normally engage in recreational activities that matter the most.
In conclusion, excessive workload at the office and the pursuit of an unimaginable well-off life are the primary causes of work-life imbalance. Nonetheless, people can address this problem by allocating more time for their families and personal activities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, nonetheless, so, thus, well, at least, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64779874214 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90741595254 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638364779874 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5573180088 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.25 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19529305454 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059981550819 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506066382186 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12549499489 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577585819456 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.