In the contemporary era, some people tend to purchase cheaper products available in the community. Although there are several advantages to this trend, I think the drawbacks are vastly greater.
On the plus side, it is by no means negligible that buying cheaper goods has benefits for consumers.
This trend could be very helpful to deal with financial problems in today’s recessions. People can purchase their favorite or necessary goods with less price that helps them to invest their money in a better way such as having a vacation in a foreign country. To illustration, some stores sell their products off at a discount that draws a large volume of people from different areas to buy things at an adequate cost. Moreover, cheaper products are the only choice for some group of people especially those with lower financial means that can not afford to buy expensive goods. Take laborers with a lower-wage range that could not meet their needs without these cheaper goods as an example.
On the other hand, products at a low cost may be fake or have a poor quality that would hurt people's health. For example, some markets and grocery stores sell their nutrients with a discount when they are close to their expiration date. In some cases, these goods may pass their expire dates. So using them could have irreversible harm for health. Moreover, cheap shoes or clothes do not have a long life and they quickly lose their shape and usability.
In conclusion, from my point of view, inexpensive products are not usable even for an acceptable time and also in terms of the food they could be harmful to our health.
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that it is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 72
- the line graph below shows the consumption of four kinds of meat in a European Country from 1979 to 2004 56
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, as to, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87128712871 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51097645897 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577557755776 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9291213001 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190771161147 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688268970275 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398095954065 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104504211786 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415756272542 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.