People no longer use newspapers and television because the internet plays the same role. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the advent of internet in 21st century, newspapers and television being replaced by internet based online news portal and online streaming TV channels respectively, therefore people no more use traditional newspapers and TVs. I partially agree with this specifically for people in urban or city areas, however, there are still considerable number of people who prefer traditional newspapers and TVs.
On the one hand, online newspapers and TVs is attracting a growing number of people in urban or metropolitan areas for news and entertainment. There are three main reasons behind this growing trend. One is its ease of accessibility and affordability of internet particularly in city suburbs or areas. For instance, there are lots of private companies that provides numerous priced internet package targeting to customers with different level of income. In addition, it’s abundance out there over WWW with almost free of cost or charges such as New York Times, BBC, CNN etc. and these all provides up-to-date and dynamic news content, highly readable due to easy font change mechanism for all aged groups including far and short sighted people. Furthermore, live stream TV channels such as Disney Channel, HBO, 9x music etc., social site like YouTube provides enormous entertainment where anyone could indulge themselves with audio and video songs, movies, trailers, programs such as comedy shows, dramas etc.
On the other hand, there are locations or areas particularly countryside or rural areas where internet is not available yet due to remoteness and lack of infra-structure. So, people living in those places are still unable to access internet and thus could not take the advantages what web offers. Deprive of net usages, for them, traditional TVs and paper based static news content is the only source for amusement and world’s news. More importantly, even if internet becomes available in those remote corners, most of them would be incapable to proper use internet either due to lack of education or poverty. It is true in the case of developing and underdeveloped nations for example nations in Asia, Africa and Middle East.
In conclusion, I would say it is utterly disregarding to the fact that significant number of people still using traditional newspapers and TVs even though online based portals and TVs gaining popularity to a vast section of people in towns or cities around the globe.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-22 | danial08cse | 89 | view |
| 2018-09-22 | danial08cse | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-22 | danial08cse | 84 | view |
- Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 89
- Some people believe that sport is an essential part of school life for children, while others feel it should be purely optional. Discuss these opposing views and give your own opinion. 78
- In many countries, plastic shopping bags are the main type of rubbish. They cause water pollution and land pollution, so they should be banned. To what extent do you agree? 73
- Some people believe that sport is an essential part of school life for children, while others feel it should be purely optional. Discuss these opposing views and give your own opinion. 84
- Many young people regularly change their jobs over the years. What are the reasons for this? Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, still, therefore, thus, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 10.4138276553 269% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2046.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28682170543 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85872676276 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589147286822 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 119.566128864 49.4020404114 242% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 157.384615385 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7692307692 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7692307692 7.06120827912 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156112028568 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044484254953 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579634041042 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110054746771 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668742647139 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.