People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other
vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.
It is true that many citizens wish for governments to implement policies for raising the price of fossil fuels in order to protect the environment. As I strongly believe it is an essential change for the future of our natural environment, many alternative solutions should be prioritized before executing this policy
On the one hand, it is true that increasing the price of fuel may bring back positive effects on the environment. The increase in the spending on fossil fuels will lower the use of private vehicles, which then leads to the reduction in the carbon footprint of each citizen since the tendency to change to public transport may soon become a popular way to save budgets. Consequently, weakening the greenhouse effects and reducing the harmful effects on the natural habitats of creatures.
On the other hand, two alternative solutions need to be considered before applying them to practical situations. The first solution is upgrading the public transportation systems which include public buses and trains. Many individuals don’t take public transport as a choice because of the downgrade in the facilities as well as the inflexible time due to the limited number of buses. By upgrading and extending, public transport may soon become a popular choice with affordable prices. Another solution for these is the promotion of renewable energy. Slowly altering the use of fossil fuels with eco-friendly energy, for instance, solar and wind, will not only reduce the detrimental effects of greenhouse effects but also protect the habitat of animals since deforestation for coals will be decreased.
In conclusion, while the policies in increasing fuels for transportation play a crucial part in solving environmental problems, it is also essential to steadily change the habits of people by promoting the use of public transport and clean alternative energy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | kashyap sahil | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | huy ha | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Amanda158 | 61 | view |
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 73
- Some people think the money spent on developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Today more people are overweight than ever before What in your opinion are the primary causes of this What are the main effects of this epidemic 73
- People nowadays tend to have children at older ages What are the reasons Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Some people believe that watching television is bad for children in every way Others however say that television is good for children to develop as they grow up Discuss both views and give opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, may, so, then, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30201342282 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96593423923 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526845637584 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.6853454598 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.636363636 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8181818182 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1659993971 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061371809367 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642109467452 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117553196053 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483770661181 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.