People today do not feel safe either at home or when they are out. What
are the causes? What are the solutions?
Home and outside security are important topics of concern in modern society. NOWADAYS, due to rampant social unrest that life can be threatened at any time and place. Some explanations for this problem will be put forward, before a few possible solutions are drawn.
There are two significant reasons as to why there are apprehensions of street and resident safety. First, the wealth disparities between the rich and the poor correlate with higher crime rates. As a consequence, financial instability pushes people into resorting to offences in order to shoulder money burdens. For example, in Vietnam, burglary and robbery have become increasingly common DUE TO THE DIRE LACK OF MONEY AND THE INABILITY TO FIND EMPLOYMENT. Besides, although legal bodies have UNCOMPROMISINGLY STRUGGLED AGAINST CRIMINALS, street crimes such as pickpocketing, homicide, armed attacks still tend to increase.
Accordingly, many people prefer to stay at home rather than WANDER STREETS. Additionally, when being out on the streets, individuals are usually exposed to different types of pollution such as noise or air pollution. This might negatively affect people’s health and can even lead to fatal consequences.
Several measures can be implemented to ensure GREATER security IN THE INTEREST OF CITIZENS. An obvious solution is to tackle poverty by providing job training, which may prevent criminal activity. For example, numerous carpentry apprenticeship programs in Vietnam are launched to improve the quality of skilled labour. Therefore, the crime percentage had dropped significantly. Another solution is that surveillance cameras should be installed to help police enforce safety on public transport and roads, limiting vehicle speed and stopping careless driving.
To conclude, housing and street insecurity are caused by many factors, including the increase in traffic accidents. There are some solutions to improve safety at home and on the road, such as providing more CCTV coverage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-16 | hueyy | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | hueyy | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-14 | tieuquynh | 73 | view |
| 2022-05-03 | Nguyễn Ánh Lâm | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-10 | Pau Nguyen | 84 | view |
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- The bar graph shows the number of people employed in different workplaces in one region of Australia in 2001 and 2008 Summarize the data by selecting and reporting key factors and making comparisons where appropriate 92
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The maps below show the village of stockeford in 1930 and 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, first, if, may, so, still, therefore, as to, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64666666667 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97587335453 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686666666667 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.035026011 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1111111111 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12555638623 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0335060163223 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371988669583 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0710905775733 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452309996033 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.19 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.