Nowadays, the dilemma of our society is that a person’s worth is measured according to one’s bank balance rather than the qualities of kindness, trust and good character. In my opinion, I agree that the people of today’s century have become so self-centered and materialistic that they don’t value the generous and pious personality anymore.
Firstly, people have become so self-centered that they only want to keep relation with those who can give them some worldly benefits. When a person is rich, they find a lot of friends around them because that way they are advantageous to others and when the same person loses money, the same relatives and friends start avoiding them. I take the personal example of my family, until my father was earning well, he had many friends visiting him and requesting him financial favors, but when we went into severe financial crises. Eventually, all his friends and relatives abandoned us.
Another reason is that, nowadays, people are materialistic and they feel proud to be part of an elite class and afraid to be judged by others for keeping contact with people of a lower class. In other words, the peer pressure to maintain their own social status take preference and halt them to be linked with anyone who is in any way lower to their status. For instance, it has become a common problem in South Asia that many couples can not get married because the families do not accept the other family because of their lower material belongings regardless of the intelligence and good character of a person.
In conclusion, in today’s materialistic world, the qualities of being a better human being are rarely considered as a measurable criteria to judge a person and has been replaced by the material possession and the worldly bank balance no matter how characterless a person is.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'criterion'?
Suggestion: criterion
...g are rarely considered as a measurable criteria to judge a person and has been replaced...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01623376623 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79768980124 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581168831169 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.2382176925 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.5 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8 20.7667163134 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171638973754 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652843705818 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434292518531 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108554508631 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422132334352 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.