A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Social status and material possessions have recently been the yardstick for measuring a person's worth in the society, instead of the old-fashioned values like, honour, trust and kindness, which they see as irrelevant. I agree with this because people embrace the physical things that they see.
It is a known fact that a lot of people embrace wealth and other physical possessions which they see. In my country, Nigeria, the youth and some elderly dance to the tune of the affluent in the society. They do their biding, hoping to get a taste of their wealth as a compensation. Regrettably, majority of these high-profile people however, lack the necessary virtues of life, but their followers care less about it because they believe that wealth and high social status are what move the world. For this reason, they are not perturbed to become slaves while they garner their own status.
Another significant reason why the old-fashioned virtue do not matter any longer in this recent time is that people tend to pretend to posses those qualities for one reason or the other. It is on recorded that a poor person is more honest, kind and trustworthy than one who has amassed wealth. This is so because the impoverished want to find favor before his people or handle a political position. At the long run when they must have attained some financial stability, they begin to display the hidden arrogance, rapacity in them, so leaving the governed in despair.
In conclusion, people amount to something in the society, only when they are rich and can extend a helping hand such as money. On the other hand, old-fashioned virtues do not count any longer.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | stefan ielts | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | stefan ielts | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | Leauren | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | Nweze christabel | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | Nweze christabel | 67 | view |
- People do not regard the old fashioned way of ninety, virtue and trust as status symbol, rather they believe material possession is the criteriaTo what extent do you agree 61
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 67
- A person's worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions old fashioned values such as honour sinus and trust no longer seen important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92170818505 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60734389182 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594306049822 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7869432971 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.384615385 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148643680913 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552416775638 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531575934804 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104884302697 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546771186887 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.