A person worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old fashioned values such as honor, kindness, and trust no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

A person worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old fashioned values such as honor, kindness, and trust no longer seem important.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people think that the only important thing to judge the people’s value is the amount of money a person has. I totally disagree with this idea. This essay will discuss that the traditional values such as integrity and honesty play an important role to evaluate the personality of human.

Even though, there is no doubt that respect towards richer people has increased in the last few decades, it is not mean old fashioned values like honor, kindness and honesty are dying. The job status and material possession are not the only thing to respect people . For instance, I have neighbor who possesses all the luxuries of life but almost no one from my society has dealing with him, just because he has been to jail numbers of time in some criminal cases. This proves people still value character and morality more than money.

Although traditional values such as respect others, being responsible, honesty and integrity seem to be forgotten, but they still play an important part in many communities. For example, in common cases, employers are still assessing their potential employees based their hard working attitude, positive behavior and their integrity. Furthermore, business people are still looking for business partners who are reliable, can be trusted, and dependable. Therefore, it is important for adults to educate their children about these positive values because they still play an essential part in the societies.

In conclusion, it is easy to find many people running after materialism, but I assert a lot of other people are aware that material does not help on a long-term basis, and so that they give priority to an individual's personality, character or ethical values.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-15 Ahmed karem Mahmoud Ahmed 78 view
2018-01-26 ŞANVERDİ 73 view
Essays by user Ahmed karem Ma… :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nor, kindness and honesty are dying. The job status and material possession are n...
^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...are not the only thing to respect people . For instance, I have neighbor who poss...
^^
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... thing to respect people . For instance, I have neighbor who possesses all the lu...
^^
Line 7, column 206, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...s, and so that they give priority to an individuals personality, character or ethical value...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14028776978 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67489673065 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604316546763 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6721114898 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.083333333 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134537797415 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516489170308 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397733967365 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0747829406614 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359973528323 0.056905535591 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.