Politicans are responsible for protection of environment than individual.To what extent you agree and disagree?

Healthy ecosystem plays crucial role in the development of individuals. How to preserve the environment is the burning question of the day. Most of the people believe that leaders are responsible to protect it as compare to individual itself. I partially hold this ground due to the following reasons.

At the first glance, if I concerned about the politicians, by providing funds to the society to improve the environmental conditions providing saplings of plants without paying any penny for instance, is the best approach to save environment. Therefore, I reckon that providing funds by the government to flourish plant trees is highly effective approach to save environment.

Moving further, second main reason to protect ecosystem by government is to implement rules to protect environment. Utilising public transport or using private vehicles nodoubt, both are best mode of transportation. Still, if governance should implement the rule that everyone use liquid petroleum gas instead of petrol or diesel which release hazardous gases carbon monoxide is the best epitome.

On other hand, individual itself plays significant role to preserve nature. If a single person plant a tree in a year ultimately lead to overcome the problem of global warming. Moreover, less consumption of air-conditioner, perfumes, for instance that are responsible for depletion of ozone layer. Consequently, rise in temperature which directly effect the marine and terrestrial life of plants and animals.

To make it crown, I believe that both political parties and human beings are equally important to preserve nature.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'are the best'.
Suggestion: are the best
...or using private vehicles nodoubt, both are best mode of transportation. Still, if gover...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ys significant role to preserve nature. If a single person plant a tree in a year ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, for instance, i reckon

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55465587045 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08291553695 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623481781377 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.5896655791 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6428571429 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0865008936466 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0283833871449 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430547582245 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0416143821506 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306874261158 0.056905535591 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.