Popular events like the football world cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Use your own ideas, knowledge, and experience and support your arguments with examples and with relevant evidence
It is a true fact that various types of famous sports activities are useful for organizers and hosting countries. It is considered by many that these events play a vital role in relieving international conflicts and generate patriotic feeling among citizens in a secure way. To a certain extent, I would agree with the statement but many popular events have been created a war-like situation among supporters in past time.
On the one hand, during international events such as European football match or commonwealth games supporters and players from all over the world took part and they play with enthusiasm and represent their nation. In other words, they represent their patriotic emotions for home country safely. Furthermore, at the same time, these games also improve international relationships. To illustrate, when players welcome each other and shake hands with full warmth in spite of internal conflicts between their countries it would generate brotherhood feeling in supporters and nations. In addition, international games are also introduced culture and customs of rival countries and this trend further helpful in improving relationships between countries.
In the contrary, sometimes these games might be a cause fight among supporter or players. If it would happen then it makes a bad image of nations over the world and further upsurges the international tensions. Moreover, in these conflicts many innocents people are involved and it might degrade the good relationships between countries.
To sum up, international games can be fruitful in improving the relationship between rival countries but supporters and players should control their spirits and release the feeling of patriotism safely.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-05-22 | Kunal Bajaj | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 80
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- The diagram below shows how central heating system in a house works. 67
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth. 84
- The charts below show the level of participation in education and science in developing and industrialized countries in 1980 and 1990 52
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a secure way" with adverb for "secure"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...nerate patriotic feeling among citizens in a secure way. To a certain extent, I would agree wit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 413, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
... war-like situation among supporters in past time. On the one hand, during international...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 342, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more, at the same time, these games also improve international relationships. To ...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'furthermore', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'in addition', 'such as', 'in other words', 'in spite of', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.269230769231 0.247107183377 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.122377622378 0.155533422707 79% => OK
Adjectives: 0.129370629371 0.0946595960268 137% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0314685314685 0.0501214627716 63% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0454545454545 0.0437548338989 104% => OK
Prepositions: 0.136363636364 0.122226691241 112% => OK
Participles: 0.027972027972 0.0403226058552 69% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.96184025638 2.80594681477 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0104895104895 0.0326793684256 32% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0034965034965 0.00163938923432 213% => OK
Determiners: 0.0839160839161 0.0861772015684 97% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0244755244755 0.021408717616 114% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0034965034965 0.011925033212 29% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1715.0 1933.35771543 89% => OK
No of words: 264.0 316.048096192 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.49621212121 6.12580529183 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20517956788 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.405303030303 0.374742101984 108% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.356060606061 0.28420135186 125% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.234848484848 0.203846283523 115% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.185606060606 0.137316102897 135% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96184025638 2.80594681477 106% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.037074148 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.56093040696 103% => OK
Word variations: 59.0617686664 60.7387585426 97% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0891783567 75% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.7743622355 106% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1315207662 49.517814964 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.916666667 127.492653851 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7743622355 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.08333333333 0.814263465372 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.99599198397 75% => OK
Readability: 57.6060606061 49.1944974215 117% => OK
Elegance: 2.17543859649 1.69124875643 129% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347610320725 0.332605444948 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0939049798041 0.102741220458 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0566187029489 0.0668466124924 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.554353160799 0.534860350844 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.174453652808 0.148594505496 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143376477577 0.134430193775 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05007968131 0.0742795772207 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.308110849549 0.324371583561 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0459962664184 0.0638462369009 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226202744198 0.228012699653 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549132951242 0.058150111329 94% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.41683366733 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 9.0 5.90881763527 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 1.9629258517 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 11.0 10.4468937876 105% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.