Popular hobbies and interests change over time and are more a reflection of trends and fashions than an indication of what individuals really want to do in their spare time. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that some prevalent leisure activities are trendy but not enduring, and they do not demonstrate the endeavors of people. There are good arguments both for and against this view, but I believe it depends on different reasons.
On the one hand, I completely concur with the idea that there is a number of fashionable interests which do not continue in the long-run. First, imitating the fashion of celebrities gain popularity in the young generation rather than the elderly. For those who are older, they have are prone to bear much more burden on finance, and thus, are less likely to be interested in fashion. Also, their hobbies might change into healthy activities such as going to the gymnasium or doing yoga. Second, aping the fashionable trend merely reflects the feeling of desire to fit in the community. Many individuals aspire to be considered as stylish people rather than unfashionable which might contribute to their confidence. After the trend went away, they are deemed to continue following the latest tendency.
On the other hand, I believe that for some individuals there are some prevalent interests are still lifelong. The first prominent justification is that healthy activities, including playing sports and eating vegetables as well, plays a pivotal role in maintaining decent mental physical health. In other words, these hobbies are indispensable for our lifestyle, and thus, are might be maintained in the long term. Furthermore, there are some pleasures which belong to the inherent interests and stem from individual personality traits. These type of leisure hobbies could be kept for a long time. Doing garden or even collecting, for instance, are two of the most prevalent pastimes people often have.
In conclusion, while the reasons can be given to justify that the prevalent leisure activities illustrate the latest tendencies and styles rather than long-lasting interests, I believe this is not an accurate statement under any circumstances.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-12 | Jo Vu | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-05 | huynhle | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-05 | huynhle | 61 | view |
| 2020-12-28 | chaoliumax | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-28 | chaoliumax | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- The picture below shows how a hot balloon works Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 88
- It has been said that people who read for pleasure have more developed imaginations and language skill than people who prefer to watch TV. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- The gap between the rich and the poor is increasingly wide, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause? What are the solutions to address those problems? 84
- Science finds that by studying the behavior of three-year-old children they can predict if they will grow up to be criminals. To what extent is criminality related to human nature? Is it possible to stop children from being a criminal when they grow up? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...rly. For those who are older, they have are prone to bear much more burden on finan...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, still, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in other words, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30188679245 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85240234221 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578616352201 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5161522575 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.375 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192386939033 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597077888052 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368874620813 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0952244458293 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730701436291 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.