The presence of technology in the classroom has become more and more apparent and offer students tremendous resources with which to supplement their education. Given time, technology will completely replace traditional teachers in the classroom. Do you agree or disagree?
Technology has been increasingly used throughout the world. This is very apparent in classrooms today. It is disagreed that technology will replace teachers in the classroom. This will be proven by analyzing how teachers can cater to the needs of their students as well as motivate and discipline them.
A very important aspect of teaching is the ability of the teacher to shape their teaching style to the needs of their students. As an example, if students in any given class are having trouble understanding a classroom topic, the teacher can rephrase the topic and deliver it in a more effective way. A computerized teacher would be less in-tune with what students require and thus would be incapable of doing this. Thus, technology will not replace teachers.
Motivation and discipline are key to a student’s academic success in the classroom. This is very apparent when teaching children as they require more motivation and discipline to be taught effectively. A technology-based teacher simply cannot accomplish this as certain situations require judgement as to whether a student is acting in an inappropriate manner. After analyzing this, it is clear that teachers will always be needed in the classroom.
Following the analyzation of a teacher’s ability to cater to students as well as their capability of guiding students towards success, it is clear that technology will never replace teachers in the classroom. It is expected that technology will act as a supplement to teachers and aid them in instructing their pupils.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-16 | sultan1991 | 56 | view |
| 2020-02-16 | sultan1991 | 56 | view |
| 2020-02-16 | sultan1991 | 56 | view |
- The presence of technology in the classroom has become more and more apparent and offer students tremendous resources with which to supplement their education Given time technology will completely replace traditional teachers in the classroom Do you agree 56
- The presence of technology in the classroom has become more and more apparent and offer students tremendous resources with which to supplement their education Given time technology will completely replace traditional teachers in the classroom Do you agree 56
- The importance of biodeversity is being more widely recognized as increasing numbers of species come under threat Why is species loss occurring What are the potential effects of this 61
- The presence of technology in the classroom has become more and more apparent and offer students tremendous resources with which to supplement their education Given time technology will completely replace traditional teachers in the classroom Do you agree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...as certain situations require judgement as to whether a student is acting in an inappropriate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an inappropriate manner" with adverb for "inappropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ement as to whether a student is acting in an inappropriate manner. After analyzing this, it is clear that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, thus, well, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24596774194 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04806439237 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 176.041082164 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495967741935 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1738534464 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9285714286 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7142857143 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.35714285714 7.06120827912 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349377368575 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143265283351 0.084324248473 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780261672771 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24593164988 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437831997178 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.