A private company should not have the right to do business in a city if the majority of the city’s residents object to the private company’s business operations. What is your opinion?
The opinion of local inhabitants in a neighbourhood, specially in a city, should be prioritized in the case of deciding whether a non-government company should be set within their locality. This is because if a great number of people in the city is against the company's business scheme and proceedings, then there will be general unrest which will lead to uncertainty and dissatisfaction among the city's residents. In my opinion, the people have a right to protest or boycott the products of the particular business, however if the business is following the rules and regulations and is not doing anything illegal, then they should not be forced out of the city.
The people of a city might have different opinions and views about a particular business depending on their values, mission and vision. While a business might open up new job opportunities and small businesses might also be set up as a result, however, the problems caused by the operations of the business will adversely affect the daily life of the citizens. For example, if a company sets up a factory which causes a lot of wastage and pollution and that needs to be carried away daily, it will lead to traffic congestion. Furthermore, the living conditions in the city is likely to become less congruent to the people's health and lives as a result. In the future, more mental, physical and social problems might arise as a result of the company's daily activities.
On the other hand, if the company follows the rules and regulations and does not carry out any illegal activities, then the government cannot obstruct the company to be set up. This is because organizations have a right to make autonomous decisions disregarding the opinions of the mass. Furthermore, if the company faces protest, then it has to be based on good reasoning and if necessary they will change their decisions. Definitely, the people have a right to boycott and spread rumours about the company, but whether the company has a right to do business in a particular city is not a right that can be taken away by the locals.
With the arguments presented above, I personally believe that private company's like private citizens have a freedom of choice and whether they wish to carry out their business transactions is up to them and outsiders cannot have a right to hinder this, until and unless the company is deteriorating their living conditions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-06 | tahmeed1993 | 73 | view |
- The graphs below show the enrollments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period. 78
- Safety standards are important when people build homes Who are responsible for this the government or the people who build the homes 67
- "The city of Grandview has provided annual funding for the Grandview Symphony since the symphony's inception ten years ago. Last year the symphony hired an internationally known conductor, who has been able to attract high-profile guest musician 58
- A course law should be made mandatory in school to bring up law abiding citizens. 22
- A private company should not have the right to do business in a city if the majority of the city’s residents object to the private company’s business operations. What is your opinion? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 616, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... likely to become less congruent to the peoples health and lives as a result. In the fu...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'freedom'.
Suggestion: freedom
...ate companys like private citizens have a freedom of choice and whether they wish to carr...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, then, while, as to, for example, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.914004914 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87841167303 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479115479115 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 639.0 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.5665805196 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.846153846 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3076923077 20.7667163134 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313330270113 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116430047629 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640917600304 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209295361458 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270419764406 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.