In the modern globalization era, gradually increasing of private cars leads to a lot of issues both pollution and global warming. It is commonly suggested that government should adjust to an expenditure budget for development of mass transport services which solve this problem, while others personally recommend that government should disburse for alternatives private vehicles, such as electric cars, to decrease drawback of typical cars. Even if both proposals seem to useful, I think the first suggestion should be applied because it is urgent.
Firstly, public transport system helps the society in many ways. The fewer cars on road, the less traffic accidents. Moreover, for most people, public buses are more economical than private cars. Therefore, most cities have public transport infrastructure. It goes without saying that the development studies about public services do not require spending money like water. For example, government should enhance different types of mass transportation. Especially in metropolitan city, number of trains, public buses vehicles can be risen within the working hours for commuter and pupils. Another example is people can be directed to public transport by organizing of meets and TV programs which become aware of global pollution and damages. In addition, I think if prices of bus or train tickets are dropped, people run to use public transportation.
On the other hand, innovation about up-to-date cars such as electric vehicles may solve this issue but it will take years, at best two decades. This take a long time and we do not enough time to protect our environment.
On the whole, from all reasons above I strongly believe that government should spend so much money for improving mass transport systems and after this they should be able to invest producing of electric cars.
- The proliferation of private cars on the roads in many parts of the world has led to serious problems of pollution and may contribute to global warming. Some people think that governments should spend money for the development of public transportation sys 89
- The maps shows how Sidney international airport was in 1930 and how it is today 57
- In your opinion, should young people choose their professions, or should their parents choose for them? 73
- The diagram below explain the process of making wood pellets which are a type of fuel used for heating building 78
- The table shows the percentage of very good rated by first year students 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, i think, in addition, such as, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32413793103 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79241370794 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627586206897 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.848404418 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.933333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341194039286 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987060717727 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469537537016 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174269080515 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955979679938 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.