qlkw5syt
Nowadays, the development and popularity of state-of-art technology in mobile gadgets has changed the way people communicate and connect with each other. This revolution engenders a public debate of whether the cons of these devices cancel out their drawback on human. In my standpoint, I strongly side with people who agree with this statement.
It is disputable that such tools provide people with distant communication as well as study and work. In other words, the introduce of cutting-edge smartphones and tablets has empowered people to conveniently and comfortably keep in touch with their family and friends. Furthermore, within the widespread of smartphones, social networking sites namely Facebook and Instagram enable people connect with others of diverse background and personalities. Besides, when surfing the Internet, users could keep up with the rest of the world with up-to-date news.
In spite of communication technology advantages, over-using these mobile devices may bring out a number of cons on both mental and physical health of users. Were a person engross in games and social networking sites, he would face with difficulties in interacting with others in real life. In addition, phone addiction also leads to mental problems such as anxiety and depression as well as activity-related illness. In fact, it is reported that over 40% youngsters who uses smartphones are suffering such diseases day by day.
In conclusion, communication technology has became an essential part of people life as its undeniable advantages. However, the pros of mobile gadgets are outweighed by negative impacts on the users themselves.a
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-01 | chirox.ame | 11 | view |
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 89
- Hosting international sport events 61
- Around the world it is likely that more adults will work from home and more children will study from home as computer technology becomes cheaper and more accessible Do you think it is a negative or a positive development 78
- Some believe technology has made our lives too complex and the solution is to lead a simpler life without technology 61
- Nowadays the development and popularity of state of art technology in mobile gadgets has changed the way people communicate and connect with each other This revolution engenders a public debate of whether the cons of these devices cancel out their drawbac 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 118, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...well as study and work. In other words, the introduce of cutting-edge smartphones and tablets...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 506, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'diseases'' or 'disease's'?
Suggestion: diseases'; disease's
...who uses smartphones are suffering such diseases day by day. In conclusion, communicati...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...re suffering such diseases day by day. In conclusion, communication technology ha...
^^
Line 4, column 45, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...onclusion, communication technology has became an essential part of people life as its...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, in other words, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50988142292 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12147377956 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620553359684 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4238561988 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.230769231 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8461538462 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.244688304435 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.084324248473 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151304729494 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.