The range and quality of food that we can buy has changed because of
technological and scientific advances. Some people regard this change as an
improvement, while others believe that it is harmful.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Nowadays, due to technological and scientific development, there is a noticeable difference in types of food as well as food quality compared to those in the past. While I accept that this disparity could be negative, I believe that the benefits of this change outweigh the drawbacks
The negative implications of this change are often discussed in terms of two key areas which are unhealthy food and genetically modified crops. Firstly, people distrust food that may contain a large number of harmful substances which cause detrimental diseases to humans. For example, when applying high tech to food production, factories may utilize chemical materials to facilitate the process, making products poisonous for consumers. Secondly, genetically modified plants might change the whole ecosystem. This is because these crops may be more resistant to disease, insects, and predators, leading to the fact that the food chain could be broken.
A more optimistic prediction, and one that I favor, is that people are using technological advancement in responsible ways to enhance the quality of our lives. From the food production perspective, farmers can produce crops that grow bigger and faster in harsh conditions, which is a good solution to famine in developing countries. In addition, by using scientific inventions, people can change agricultural practices which can reduce pesticides and herbicides harmful to the environment. For instance, the scientific consensus is that the use of transgenic insect-resistant crops is reducing the volume and frequency of insecticide on plants, demonstrating environmental benefits and health advantages for farmworkers.
In conclusion, I am convinced that technological and scientific advancement is improving the range and quality of food and that people’s fears will be unwarranted
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-22 | myhuyenueh94 | 78 | view |
- Pollution of rivers lakes and seas is a major concern for people who seek to protect the environment What are the possible causes of water pollution and what effects does this have on animal life and human society 84
- Major cities in the world are growing fast as well as their problems What are the problems that young people living in those cities are facing Suggest some solutions 89
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socializing online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 89
- The range and quality of food that we can buy has changed because of technological and scientific advances Some people regard this change as an improvement while others believe that it is harmful Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
..., people distrust food that may contain a large number of harmful substances which cause detrimen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63405797101 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22689832825 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576086956522 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.6785032213 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.363636364 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3636363636 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29275122488 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103826670748 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704971512191 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187342613356 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402206053117 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.