Reading story books is better for children than watching television or playing computer games. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the past few decades, the education of children has become more important. Numerous parents believe that tv programs or video games are not as effective as reading. In my opinion, suppose it but tv programs and video games have their advantages for children.
Firstly, story books have an irreplaceable role in children’s education, children can learn lots of vocabulary through it. Also, children would learn different experience or moral which contributes to children’s mental development, too. For example, the moral of snow white is that do not eat any food from strangers and children can learn that the consequence of telling personal information to strangers from the little red. Furthermore, story books were written by the expert of children, therefore the context should be appropriate to children and the parents do not need to worry about the content.
However, tv programs and video games are beneficial tools for education. Studies have indicated that listing significantly contributes to the development of children’s brain, in other words, tv programs and video games have the advantage which story books do not have. Also, video games can improve the coordination of a child’s eyes and hands, and tv programs can offer different knowledge such as biology, science, and art, children can choose which field they are interested in.
To sum up, although story books were a traditional approach to education, the advantages of tv programs and video games can not be ignored. In this modern century, We should provide an appropriate, interesting and comfortable environment of learning to our next generation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, for example, such as, in my opinion, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43410852713 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08267975766 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554263565891 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5426708921 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.833333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14499319003 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628856951791 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442480858413 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895049549284 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050885538605 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.