Recycled products are considered a safe way to save the environment. However, there are many arguments that recycling process often releases low quality outcome. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
It is thought by some people that reprocessing of waste to recover reusable materials often emits low quality consequences. However, I agree with the idea that products made from recycled goods are considered a safe way to protect the environment.
To begin with, there are a variety of reasons why the recycling process releases outcome which do not have quality enough. First and foremost, recycled products is not high-quality in many cases. For example, most kinds of products made from trash were collected in rubbish dump. As a result, unless the process is carefull, products will not be durable and useful when consumers use it. In addition, workers in recycling factories could be forced to work in poor working conditions. As a matter of fact, the recycling sites are always unhealthy and unsafe, because it has a great number of garbage which is needed to recycle. Moreover, the workers could be put in dangerous due to the harmful chemicals from these wastes.
On the other hand, products recycled are examined a probable way to save the environment. Firstly, it could reduce the huge number of garbage released. For instance, plastic packaging is a popular kind of the rubbish which does not break down easily. Consequently, if it is not thrown away in trashcans, it will spoil the nature beauty such as caves, beaches or oceans. Secondly, recycled products will mitigate greenhouse effect destroying the environment. To be more specific, garbage brunt or buried would discharge carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, which leads to air pollution. In other words, the amount of greenhouse gases will contribute to climate change, and it will rise the global temperatures, which is a main reason of global warming.
In conclusion, although some people believe that the low quality outcome is discharged frequently in the recycling process, I am convinced that the environment will be safe when individuals use the recycled products.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-22 | Van Luong Ngoc Thuy | 78 | view |
- More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses for communities in poorer countries What are the reasons for this Who benefits more from this the communities or these young 79
- Scientists agree that people are damaging their health by eating too much junk food. Some people think that the answer to this problem is to educate people. Others think education will not work. Discuss both views and state your opinion. 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people using various form of transport in France 71
- Some animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in the sea. What are the reason? What solution to solve them? 73
- Children’s education is expensive. In some countries, the government pays some of or all of the costs. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages ? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, in many cases, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17405063291 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81141456115 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575949367089 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.995866737 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1764705882 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5882352941 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.7058823529 7.06120827912 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288424975974 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918445388588 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959255232351 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189451327897 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596361636868 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.