To reduce the dependence on modern technology, some families have tried “digital detox”- spending some time together away from electronic devices such as televisions, computers and smartphones. Do you think it is a good trend? What’s your point of view on this issue? Write in an essay of at least 300 words
It is widely acknowledged that electronic devices exert profound influence on daily life. In order to reduce the reliance on technology, digital detox, which prevent people from using electronic products, is considered as an ideal way. In this essay, I am going to demonstrate various effects that the method has on people before showing how this is a positive trend.
Living without using electronic devices affects people in numerous way. First and foremost, conducting digital detox could reduce several health problems as overusing digital devices could lead to a physiological addiction similar to drug addiction as well as disorders seen in people who addicted to alcohol or caffeine. Should digital detox be conducted, the frequency of browsing social media could be reduced so that people could spend more times taking on new habits and learning new skills, which in turn relieve the symptoms of addiction and improving holistic health. Additionally, detoxing could encourage and strengthen social interaction between people, which may prevent isolation and improve happiness. A study in 2019 demonstrated that spending an excessive amount of time using digital gadgets may have a long-term influence on communication skills such as eye contact or body languages due to the lack of face to face communication. As a result, digital detox can promote social interaction between people in the long run
Simultaneously, digital detox is also causing people feeling of isolation and loneliness as getting rid of digital device cut people from their normal means of communication. For those heavy reliant on electronic gadgets, detoxing may take a toll on people by triggering anxiety and stress in tandem with causing irritability and mood swings. An international study has shown that abstaining from social media could be a bane to individuals as people who abstained from using digital devices witness a decrease in life satisfaction. Therefore, detoxing may not necessarily bring about positive impacts.
In conclusion, as people tend to rely more on digital devices, I am convinced that detoxing could be an positive trend due to the benefits it has.
- For many employers formal academic qualifications are becoming more important than experience Why is this a negative trend 100
- The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996 1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia 84
- The chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000 Unit microgram per m3 67
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 102, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
..., I am convinced that detoxing could be an positive trend due to the benefits it h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38348082596 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92789170541 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557522123894 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.6862724664 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.384615385 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0769230769 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172094483171 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680863577991 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0252969909697 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113351276387 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300881277806 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.