Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals.To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Worldwide environmental degradation is hot issue which is cared by almost people all over the world. It is believed that this problem should be tackled by governments instead of by personal. I partly agree with this view.
To begin with, governments play an integral part in controlling global warming. First and foremost, governments have power to enactus environmental laws in order to decline the emission from industrial zones. For example, applying heavy fine like a mount of penalty money toward companies which discharge toxic waste into environmental is a good solution that government can implemental to reduce global environmental damage. Secondly, authorities of countries should reduce dependence on fossil fuels by raising residents' awareness about using renewable energy resources such as wind power or solar energy. The fact that the less fossil fuels are spent, the more slowly global warming process happen. In addition, governments ought to focus on investing advanced technology so as to produce more eco-friendly vehicles. This will decrease the significant amount of greenhouse emission gases discharged environment.
On the other hand, the environmental policies which governments promulgate can not success without co-operating with individuals. Firstly, residents must be active in protecting global environmental from emissions. It is clearly seen that the environment policies of governments will be not effectively if civilians does not obey these laws. Moreover, individuals can reduce international environment destruction by practical activities. Due to the fact that global warming stems from spending more electricity, people can contribute on declining emission by turning off light bulbs in some unnecessary cases, avoiding littering the streets and using more fuel-efficiency vehicles.
In conclusion, although governments play a vital role in declining earth environmental damage, this problem is only solved effectively if people work at it on collective level, not individual level.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-03-26 | mr.cuong95 | 84 | view |
- IN SOME COUNTRIES PEOPLE ARE NOT TAKING CARE OF THEIR ELDERLY RELATIVES SOME BELIEVE THAT THE ELDERLY PEOPLE SHOULD LIVE IN NURSING HOME WHERE TRAINED PROFESSIONAL CARE For THE ELDERLY OTHERS THINK THEY SHOULD LIVE WITH THE YOUNGER FAMILY MEMBERS DISCUSS 84
- The charts below give information about the percentage of sources of the electricity produced between 2003 nd 2008 0f 4 counties 56
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Now big cities have many problems. What are these problems? Do you think the government should encourage city residents to move to small cities and towns? 84
- Countries where there is high unemployment most pupils should be offered only primary education there is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding a job To what extent do you agree or disagree 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Worldwide environmental degradation is hot issue w...
^^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'residents'' or 'resident's'?
Suggestion: residents'; resident's
...e dependence on fossil fuels by raising residents awareness about using renewable energy ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 776, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... focus on investing advanced technology so as to produce more eco-friendly vehicles. Thi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85810810811 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18259022963 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635135135135 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9650101769 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.375 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209182745527 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681924313775 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360480786234 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119348124319 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410875999011 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.