Some findings indicate that the main part of offenders possibly break the rules again after being releasing back into society. While there are some reasons for this trend, it can be alleviated in some ways.
People who already finished their custodial sentences whether or not they will continue their illegal activities in the future. Firstly, criminals usually encounter communities’ discrimination because of what they did in the past. Since their own communities reject their efforts to make a fresh start, they easily commit further crime after reintegrating back into society. Secondly, the number of criminals returning to crime climbs in some countries because they have no jobs to make ends meet after finishing their sentences. It is clear that prisoners confront with many obstacles to be recruited, and therefore, if they have no chance to get normal jobs, they easily turn to drug trafficking or theft to earn a living.
However, we can minigate this trend by some interventions. Firstly, governments should raise public awareness to give ex-offenders needy supports so that they feel a sense of being accepted. Residents in communities should be generous so that people who had good behaviour during their sentences to live a better life. Secondly, criminals should have opportunities to participate in vocational courses during the custodial period. A large number of ex-offenders turn to crime because they do not have a job, and therefore, vocational courses are good preparation to help them have a better rehabilitation.
In conclusion, it is clear that there are many people who return to crime due to the discrimination and unemployment, so governments should impose some remedies to prevent them from breaking the laws
- In many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects What are the causes And what will be the effects on society 73
- The graph below shows the average class size in six countries and compares it with the world average class size in 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main points and give comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012 84
- The charts show the sales of new cars in Australia in 1984 1993 and 2013 73
- The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 55, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...eady finished their custodial sentences whether or not they will continue their illegal activi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 432, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
...al courses during the custodial period. A large number of ex-offenders turn to crime because they...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s to prevent them from breaking the laws
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97113820881 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5062724403 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.230769231 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128280138037 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486894609569 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0256032987838 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738210618164 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179330628063 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.