Research suggests that majority of criminals who are sent to prison commit crimes when set free What are the reasons What can be done to solve the problem

It is suggested that numerous offenders who are imprisoned continue to break the law when they are released from prison. This phenomenon may be led by poverty, unemployment, and lack of education, but many measures could be taken to tackle this problem.
To begin with, there are many reasons for reoffending. Firstly, the criminal record could make finding a job more difficult for a prisoner because the employers tend to suspect the prisoners' reliability. Added to that, when some people who break the law do not have a job, they might be addressed with poverty. As a consequence, they may commit crimes again so that they can have money to live. Secondly, some offenders who lack education may not be worried about receiving prison sentences again. They continue engaging in criminal activities to gain benefits for themselves and ignore the negative effects that they contribute to society.
However, many possible solutions could be taken to avoid criminals from reoffending. In terms of finding a job, lawbreakers should be given an equal chance of working and be provided vocational training. If they have suitable skills, they can attract employers and can earn a living without taking part in unlawful acts. For example, if offenders are competent at cooking, they can have the chance of working in restaurants. Finally, the government needs to impose more severe punishments on the reoffending, which may serve as a deterrent to the criminals to avoid doing bad things again. For example, a robber may be jailed 5 years in prison but if he continues taking part in the unlawful acts, he may be jailed for 6 years.
In conclusion, it is clear that there are various reasons for committing crimes again, and steps need to be taken to deal with this problem.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 181, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'prisoners'' or 'prisoner's'?
Suggestion: prisoners'; prisoner's
...cause the employers tend to suspect the prisoners reliability. Added to that, when some p...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00675675676 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7333732708 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550675675676 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9447073104 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.8 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197537989273 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731618658026 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361223744842 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141215229184 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215478586136 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.