The restoration of old buildings in major cities throughout the world involves enormous expenditure. This money would bring more benefits if it was used to provide new housing and road development.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, in cities most of the old buildings do not give attractive look or add beauty to the cities around the world because they have constructed there from many years, therefore these buildings need renovation. However, some people think that despite of wasting money over refurbishment, it is better to use money for making new houses and roads. I agree with this statement to great extent.
To begin with,if new houses replace old establishments, it will fulfill land availability as population is increasing day by day and urbanization leads to less space availability, thus people need more and more space so that the can erect their houses. Consequently, it will improve the living standard of humans. Secondly, road development may solve many problems as road accidents are much more in those cities, where road has constructed poorly. In this way, human life will be out of danger.
Moreover, beautiful houses as well as new constructed roads improves the infrastructure of the city or country, thus it will have good impression on visitors of foreign countries. To be exemplified, if tourists come to visit that nation, which has roads in good condition and magnificent buildings, they influence by it due to good impact and it will help to develop good reputation ubiquitously. Last but not least is, country's development which is directly connected to the satisfaction of public because when government give such facilities, it is definitely appreciated by the resident.
To end, public is the soul of a nation and if they are happy then the country will also become prosperous and successful, therefore it is better for both authorities that they give good housing than refurbishing the present old structured buildings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-03 | madhvi291199 | 64 | view |
- Some people like to do only what they already do well Other people prefer to try new things and take risks Which one do you prefer 86
- The restoration of old buildings in major cities throughout the world involves enormous expenditure This money would bring more benefits if it was used to provide new housing and road development To what extent do you agree or disagree 64
- Some people like to do only what they already do well Other people prefer to try new things and take risks Which one do you prefer 33
- The restoration of old buildings in major cities throughout the world involves enormous expenditure. This money would bring more benefits if it was used to provide new housing and road development.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , if
...tatement to great extent. To begin with,if new houses replace old establishments, ...
^^^
Line 2, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s increasing day by day and urbanization leads to less space availability, thus p...
^^
Line 2, column 397, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...problems as road accidents are much more in those cities, where road has construc...
^^
Line 6, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for both authorities that they give good housing than refurbishing the present ol...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18085106383 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99943198351 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617021276596 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.9797768878 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.818181818 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2727272727 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1837695515 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672913667585 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496166957052 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108482123968 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767205610653 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.