Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Affording financial aid to the poor countries is not the solution of the poverty problem. Consequently, the developed countries should provide other type of help to underdeveloped countries instead of giving money. I do agree to the statement extended that the underdeveloped countries should obtain other supports from the world leading nations.
Nowadays, money has become part of world trading system, but there is still a significant gap between each individual. Providing the financial aid to the poor countries could be a short-term solution of reducing the gap of poverty. To specify more detail, the poor country is able to insert more amount of money in the economic which would help putting up a bit in overall of country appearance in world community. However, it does not serve as a solution of individual poverty.
On the contrary, the given money might lead to other problem which would have to be handle after.
The developed country could give out other kinds of supports, for instance, human resource. Well developed human resource could plant the new root of economic in those poor countries. With the technology being brought into the countries, they will be able to develop a sustainable system to fulfill the niche of populace. This advancement could lead to having an ability to exist and compete more in the world community which will provide a long-term solution of poverty.
In conclusion, other types of help should be sent to the poor countries to help them develop their individual economic system. Giving the money could be used to solve the problem, but not for long-term solution. Providing well-developed human resource to foster the root of economic could support more as a long-term strategy.
- The bar chart shows the amount spent on digital games in the USA and China from 2010 to 2017 and the pie chart shows global spending on these games in 2017 95
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Some people think that taxation should be able to keep to a minimum as the money people earn should be theirs to do with as they wish Others believe that people should pay a significant level of tax in order to support the public services we all depend on 72
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to put', 'to putt' or 'put', 'putt'.
Suggestion: to put; to putt; put; putt
... money in the economic which would help putting up a bit in overall of country appearan...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 304, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...the root of economic could support more as a long-term strategy.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, so, still, well, for instance, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22340425532 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79284305599 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507092198582 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7561394411 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.2 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354425094955 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135736009754 0.084324248473 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108068298437 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210596055635 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128099138896 0.056905535591 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.